Ruth Negga Joel Edgerton Nick Kroll Michael Shannon Margaret Blackwood
Another Jeff Nichols (Mud, Take Shelter, Midnight Special) film that quietly pulls at your heart and reason
and captures your attention. It’s
aptly entitled because the last name of the interracial couple having to buck
Virginia’s outdated law against their union is Loving. When their case, championed by the
ACLU, goes to the Supreme Court, and the attorney asks Richard (Edgerton) what
he wants to say to the Court, Richard’s answer is simply “I love my wife.” Nichols wrote the screenplay based on
an actual case, but he dramatized it, using as much information as he could
glean about the actual case. In
the Q&A after the screening in Austin, Texas, he said all the legal
information he gathered would have made a very boring movie, so he chose to
write a drama, keeping the focus on the couple.
Loving
is about an interracial couple in the ‘50s-‘60s who defied Virginia law against
miscegenation by going to Washington D.C. to get married, and upon returning
home living together as husband and wife.
They lead a normal life in a family atmosphere, unaware of a “snitch”
who informs the local police.
The Lovings are an interesting twosome—she is
only 19 when they marry (in Washington D.C.)—and he takes his responsibility
for caring for her seriously. So
when they are roused from a deep sleep by policemen invading their bedroom one
night and hauling them into jail, we see the beginnings of his disillusionment
(“It’s just not right”) and mystification, although he continues to accommodate
to the sentencing they receive (which is lighter than it otherwise would have
been, thanks to a sympathetic local lawyer who is a friend of the judge), which
uproots them from their home and her family to the city of Washington D.C. He is a good honest worker-type who
diligently drives back to their hometown every day for work.
As time goes on (marked by seasons changing and
children being born), Mildred (Negga) develops more confidence and
assertiveness, so when her relative giving them accommodations in Washington
says to her during the Civil Rights marches in the ‘60s, “Write to Robert
Kennedy; you need to get you some
civil rights”, Mildred does just that, which gets the ACLU involved. It’s at this point that we see
Mildred’s gradual transformation into a sharp woman who comprehends what the
lawyers and press are telling her and becomes aware of the social significance
and implications of their pressing forward.
Another thing I love about Nichols’ writing is
that he makes this transformation positive and non-threatening to Richard,
partly because of her loving nature, but partly because his inner strength
makes him thoughtful and, once again, accommodating, always from a strong
position. (The movie could be an
inspiration for couples in achieving equality in their relationship, along with
its message about equality for all citizens.)
The casting of these two characters could not
have been better. Ruth Negga
epitomizes a woman we can admire in any age—tender, sharp, decisive in a quiet
way, sympathetic, and empathetic.
[For fun, you can contrast this with Richard’s mother (Sharon
Blackwood), a midwife, who is scary looking when we first meet her, devoid of
emotion and issuing out instructions, yet still supportive of her
patients. It’s unnerving later to
see her as a doting grandmother, but that is Nichols again capturing human
nature in all its variances.]
Joel Edgerton should be highly praised for
portraying this character who is eloquent in nonverbal language but terse or
reticent verbally. His facial
expressions, eyes, body language, and cryptic comments give you a full picture
of who he is, what he values, and what he is about. Both Edgerton and Negga embody Nichols’ subtlety and
accuracy in honing in on the human psyche with all its complexities.
With all the low-key drama, we also get to
chuckle, as for instance, when Richard is evaluating the value of ACLU
lawyers—for which there is no charge—he says wryly and cynically, “You get what
you pay for.” For all his
crustiness and terse observations, Richard is the most comedic character.
Jeff Nichols, an artist with cinematic
social sensitivity who’s still entertaining and insightful.
Grade: A By
Donna R. Copeland
No comments:
Post a Comment