Showing posts with label Ryan Gosling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ryan Gosling. Show all posts

Thursday, July 14, 2022

THE GRAY MAN

 Ryan Gosling     Chris Evans     Ana de Armas     Rege-Jean Page     Billy Bob Thornton

 

           How to get the attending audience not to see your movie.  Make scenes so dark viewers can’t tell what’s going on or who the characters are, especially in the fight scenes.  Make it so loud that dialog can’t be heard above the din of sound effects.  Include characters that are so sadistic it’s unbearable to watch (e.g., pulling out fingernails one by one) and forces you to look away.  Write the plot so it contains implausible situations, such as the wounded continuing to fight long after they would most likely have succumbed, have a character with a heart condition be terrified time and again without having a heart attack.  And finally, mixing up the time frames by going backward and forward.

            The CIA must be grumbling about how it’s portrayed in The Gray Man (largely written, directed, and produced by Russo brothers Anthony and Joe), showing two leaders in the upper echelons of the CIA who are completely illegal and immoral.  Movies are notorious among professionals for portraying their disciplines unrealistically, and (at least I hope) this is another instance.  Of course, we know of real situations where the CIA used bad judgment, but I hate to see even those instances glorified in media.

            The star of this production is one of my favorites, Ryan Gosling, as an unfairly discredited agent being recruited to perform special jobs that are top-secret by their nature of bordering on the illegal.  Six, as he is called, does not even have a file.  Gosling is up to his usual fine performance of being extraordinarily gifted/trained in combat, and still gentle with a heart of gold.  Chris Evans is good as well as a fiendish, sadistic evil man, and it’s hard for me to believe that “Captain America” would take on such a role, but he is believably bad here.  Ana de Armas likewise plays a strong role demonstrating her fighting skills against much stronger men.  She is certainly convincing as a very bold driver.

            On the whole, the cast and its skills are the best feature of this production that looks and feels like a video game, more intent on the craft of special effects than the art of story and character.  The Russo brothers have become famous perhaps primarily for their success in the Marvel world of film, which I have enjoyed from time to time.  Here, I think they go over the top in so many ways, with no recognizable artistry.  The craft as they see it takes over the film.  The erratic editing simply provides more evidence of the film’s lack.

            

I can’t think of any reason anyone would want to see this film.

 

Grade:  D                              By Donna R. Copeland


Saturday, October 20, 2018

FIRST MAN

Ryan Gosling     Claire Foy     Jason Clarke     Kyle Chandler
Corey Stoll     Ciaran Hinds     Pablo Schreiber     Shea Whigham


     First Man is Damien Chazelle’s sharp turn away from the musical orientation of his previous hits, Whiplash and La La Land.  We do see one tender song piece near the beginning of the movie when Neil Armstrong dances nostalgically with his wife.  Thereafter, our ears are bombarded with the roars, bangs, creaks, and groans inside spacecrafts.  What he has retained in this account of NASA’s efforts to land a man on the moon before Russia in the 1960’s are intense interpersonal relationships fraught with passion, nerve-wracking episodes, and grief.  
     More than anything, the film gives an inside look at the early space endeavors, their costs in human life and money, the intense pressure all immediately involved and their families experienced, and the mixture of bonding and competitiveness that took place among the astronauts.  It presents a brilliant picture of how men work together in a competitive, high-pressure setting, which is likely to be in contrast with how women relate to one another in such an environment.  (I’m thinking specifically of the women in the film Hidden Figures, for example.) Here, there’s camaraderie, but little of the deep emotional sharing we saw in the earlier film, and much more competitiveness. 
     First Man is as well a portrait of the heroic astronaut Neil Armstrong (empathically played by Ryan Gosling), who became even more reticent after the death of his daughter, as perhaps his way of dealing with the grief.  He’s a man who doggedly pursues his goals without being deterred by setbacks, does not hesitate to use his own judgment in place of what he is told to do, and although his emotions are tightly hidden and controlled, this defense can be broken through in certain circumstances.  The latter achieved by his wife Janet (Foy) in a scene that highlights her influence, and may be an award-winning performance for the actor.
Chazelle has also retained two colleagues from his previous films, composer Justin Hurwitz and cinematographer Linus Sandgren, and brought in Christopher Nolan’s notable production designer Nathan Crowley, to create a powerful account of the subject that is both extravaganza with awesome special effects and deep emotional pulls. 
     The movie, based on James R. Hansen’s book, can be regarded as of historical value for young people and those seriously interested in U.S. space programs. It’s a serious account that is fascinating and entertaining as well.  A small downside could be the extended scenes inside the spacecraft, which are so noisy it’s hard to hear the dialog and the mechanical focus in the picture is not informative as to what is going on.  I read that in fact it is so noisy inside a spacecraft some astronauts experience hearing loss, so these scenes are not unrealistic; I just have some concern about my own hearing!

A fascinating and apparently realistic look behind the achievement of getting a man on the moon. 

Grade A-                                                By Donna R. Copeland

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

BLADE RUNNER 2049

Ryan Gosling     Harrison Ford     Robin Wright     Ana de Armas     Jared Leto     Sylvia Hoeks     Mackenzie Davis


   The cinematography (Roger Deakins), special effects and other-world atmosphere (production design by Dennis Gassner) give this film’s story the mystery and spookiness it deserves.  The 1982 Blade Runner film, based on Philip K. Dick’s graphic novel, has been updated by screenwriters Hampton Fancher (who also worked on the earlier film) and Michael Green under the excellent direction of Denis Villeneuve.  It’s fast-moving and suspenseful, leading the viewer down garden paths that make it seem predictable, but ultimately is not.
     ‘K’ (Gosling) is a blade runner charged by his supervisor Lt. Joshi (Wright) to track down out-moded replicants made by the Tyrell Corporation and retire them.  The new ones, manufactured by Niander Wallace (Leto), who bought the Tyrell Corporation, are considered to be so human-like a special test has been devised to distinguish between replicant and human.  ‘K’ must be tested each time he returns to base to be sure that he has not been tampered with.
     Something comes up in one of his investigations that arouses his curiosity, and he begins to pursue it, against the orders of Joshi.  This search constitutes the main part of the story with all its complexity, assortment of figures, and dangerous encounters.  He does eventually find Deckard (Ford), the original Blade Runner, who has become a recluse, and who is not very happy to see him, but K has burning questions Deckard can answer—or so he thinks.
     The picture of the future that Blade Runner 2049 constructs is alarming as well as fascinating.  Identities merge and transform with ease, paranoia about who is who is rampant, sophisticated space ships for rapid travel seem to appear out of nowhere any time, and most of the buildings look like tool shops inside.  Digitized figures (many especially in the form of sexy women) tower over the city, which is teeming with multitudes.  At one point, a character says, “We’re all just looking out for something real”, which is like the viewer’s experience throughout the story.
     2049 continues with the existential questions of the first Blade Runner, having a lot to do with issues about what it means to be human.  Yet, although it is enlightening to be familiar with the previous film, 2049 stands on its own; it’s not necessary to have seen the first film to grasp the import of the current rendition.

With robotics in our near future, it behooves us to consider what it is to be human.

Grade:  A                                    By Donna R. Copeland

Saturday, March 11, 2017

SONG TO SONG

Ryan Gosling   Rooney Mara   Michael Fassbender   Natalie Portman
 Christian Bale   Cate Blanchett   Val Kilmer   Benecio del Toro   Holly Hunter   Iggy Pop


     This is a love story about one couple, but generalizes to a broader inclusion of people in general and the natural world.  It’s an Impressionist painting, with story, song, and photography artfully expressed.  Malick has a photographer’s eye that doesn’t follow along the usual frame of plot line, but he gives us impressionistic glimpses of people’s lives and the meanings of it they construct.  Rooney Mara as Faye narrates most of the film, tracing the “dance moves” that made her life what it became.  She starts out as a receptionist for a wealthy man (Fassbender) who is a major force in people’s lives (“people change when they’re around him”, she says).  People come to him as Faye does, hoping he can help them make more of their lives.
     But the man, who is some kind of Titan in the music industry, cannot resist exerting god-like control over people he is mentoring, even while exhorting them to “be free.”   Faye ends up having an affair with him, but after a time meets another man in his orb (Gosling).  The three play, cavorting and frolicking, hoping that it will last forever.  “We thought nothing could break us apart; we made music together.”  Ah, but we are human, and thus in this story the “song to song”, “kiss to kiss” begins, and after betrayal, disappointment, and disillusionment, it finally ends in forgiveness and mercy—at least in one case, which gives us hope.
    There are contrasts drawn between the experiences of men and women, people of privilege and those less fortunate, and individuals with varying degrees of insight and introspection.  The women here seem to be more introspective and self-critical, and searching at first for someone like the wealthy man who will complete them, like Faye the narrator.  Her successor (Portman) says to the same man, “What part of me do you want?  Take what you want from me”, unaware of the bargain she made upon first meeting him when she observed, “you have everything, everything I want.”
     The men have more of a competitive relationship, and their interests are expressed in that realm, with the mentor abrasively scolding the mentee for not achieving more, and the mentee accusing the other of stealing credit for his work, which could be the undoing of their relationship.  We get few clues or evidence of introspection on their part, except for one’s toward the end.
    We get glimpses of those who have come from more modest circumstances encountering the wealth of others, and aspiring to achieve the American dream.  Some are not willing to compromise themselves; others are.  Some learn from their experience and try to change; others are oblivious.  But all experience some kind of regret over the choices they made.
     As much as Song to Song is a portrayal of life as a series of dances and songs with varying partners, it’s also a commentary on trust, fidelity, truthfulness, openness, and honesty in human relationships.  Along with the endearing playfulness (Gosling’s character takes this to the max), we’re reminded of the anguish of betrayal and the pain of separation, but as well the possibility of a “new paradise” in forgiveness.
     The four talented main actors (Gosling, Fassbender, Mara, and Portman) show their skill in responding to Malick’s rather unique direction, and impress with their delightful athletic abilities in dancing and cavorting through all the scenes showing the blooming of new love.  Blanchett’s brief scenes show her power in conveying deep emotion, and cameo appearances of Bale, Kilmer, del Toro, Hunter, Iggy Pop, and still more, provide additional entertainment and scope.  A most impressive appearance is Patti Smith, singing of her love of the photographer Robert Mapplethorpe and through it, giving sound advice to Faye.
     Malick’s teaming with his award-winning partner in cinematography, Emmanuel Lubezki, makes Song to Song a true work of art visually, dramatically, psychologically, and philosophically.

A song of love in many of its manifestations, ending on a high note.

Grade:  A                                                By Donna R. Copeland

Monday, November 14, 2016

LA LA LAND

Ryan Gosling     Emma Stone     J.K. Simmons     John Legend     Rosemarie DeWitt     Finn Wittrock


          Would you like to visit an adult fantasyland for a couple of hours?  This movie will take you there with its entertaining and still meaningful script (by Director Damien Chazelle), its captivating, artistically presented cinematography by Linus Sandgren, songs and score composed and orchestrated by Justin Hurwitz, and two very fine actors (Gosling and Stone) who can sing and dance up a storm as well as act.   The talent going into making the film is truly impressive.  It is mostly light entertainment, but makes insightful points about choosing a career and whether or not to stick with original plans.  It also represents a contemporary dilemma for couples whose jobs take them in opposite directions.  I loved the playful ending’s toying with us by presenting alternatives from which we can choose.
        Sebastian (Gosling) and Mia (Stone) seem destined to meet, after a hostile encounter on the jammed freeway, a chance meeting in a club, and a party.  They spar with one another, then dance together on a hilltop overlooking the twinkling lights of Los Angeles, and before long, they’re ambivalently hooked.  I say ambivalent because their first date to a classic movie, Rebel without a Cause, is just “for research.” 
        At this point, Sebastian is a struggling jazz pianist who takes a purist stance about the genre, and is finding it hard to get and keep a job.  Mia goes to one disheartening audition after another, in one of which the producer interrupts a gripping emotional sequence to take a phone call, then dismisses her.  (I understand this was based on an experience Gosling actually had.)
       As their romance heats up, both get career opportunities.  Sebastian is invited to join a combo run by his old college friend Keith (Legend), and Mia writes a one-woman screenplay.  But after a time, they find they’re not spending much time together, primarily because Sebastian has joined the combo and is often away touring.  They have arguments and misunderstandings, although during the course of these, each one provides valuable counsel to the other.  She encourages him to follow his life’s dream of owning his own jazz club; he boosts her confidence by encouraging her to continue to pursue writing and acting. 
    We never know how things are going to turn out, but throughout the story their intermittent  songs and dances are electric (choreography is by Mandy Moore).  In these onstage performances, Gosling and Stone are so smooth they appear to have worked together for years, but this is only their third time to act together, and the first time in a musical. 
     And BTW, that's Gosling actually playing the piano; not a double or CGI.  

La La Land is magical in its fantasy and in the artistry of all involved in the production.

Grade:  A                                    By Donna R. Copeland

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

THE NICE GUYS

Russell Crowe     Ryan Gosling     Matt Bomer     Kim Basinger     Angourie Rice


          Holland March (Gosling) and Jackson Healy (Crowe) are like Abbott and Costello private detectives.  They argue, fight, and bumble their way through the plot of trying to locate a missing woman.  They’re often puzzled about what is transpiring, yet manage to get through all the scrapes.  Their characters are interesting, and Gosling shows more comedic chops and timing here than in his previous comedies.  March seems hopelessly incompetent and clumsy with a weakness for alcohol, yet has a brain and is well read enough that his vocabulary often stumps his competitor/fellow principal investigator Healy.  He also has a kind heart (placing a pillow under an unconscious foe), and is devoted to his daughter Holly (Rice) as best as he knows how.
           Healy, on the other hand, is very serious, doesn’t drink (much) on the job, and serves as the brawn to March’s brain.  He has a conscience and a kind heart too—at least for children—and is not quite as ready to stiff his clients as March is.  Crowe is perfect in portraying a street-smart brute who can lure his prey by distraction then deliver crushing blows.
          Neither March nor Healy is a very responsible adult for children, but quick-witted Holly inserts herself into their jobs and turns out to be a valuable, though unacknowledged, aide.  She lends her own wry, astute comedic observations of the adults and manages to be at the right place at the right time, uncovering important clues, and coming up with ploys or a gun that she knows how to use.  Although it is disconcerting to see, that along with the good values she has absorbed from her father, she has also learned techniques of sociopathic exploitation.
      This is a mess of a movie in some ways, with tons of violence and over-the-top ridiculous plot twists.  My impression is that this could have been a sensationally funny, dramatic hit with a message if the writer/director Shane Black and his co-writer Anthony Bagarozzi had chosen subtlety over unrestrained stunts and violence simply for effect.  For instance, it’s hilarious when one flirtatious character swims after mermaids and does a back flip over a wall to impress a woman, but ends up tumbling down a hill.  But this is not Shakespeare’s Midsummer’s Night Dream, a farce with multiple plot lines ultimately making a statement about the mysteries of love.
       If The Nice Guys has an underlying point, it may come at the end when the two protagonists are cynically reflecting on the corruption of justice and the manifold points of view that can come to bear on real situations.  It’s too bad the filmmakers did not elaborate more on this, Healy’s wrestling with his conscience (especially when it is pricked by Holly) and March’s coming to terms with his guilt about his wife’s death, which would have made the story more substantive and meaningful.

The Nice Guys is a farce with unrealized potential.

Grade:  B+                        By Donna R. Copeland

Monday, March 16, 2015

FILM REVIEW OF LOST RIVER AND A CONVERSATION HOUR WITH RYAN GOSLING AND GUILLERMO DEL TORO

-->

-->
Review

            “Broken pieces trying to make a whole” is how writer/director Ryan Gosling describes his new film, Lost River.  He follows a single-parent family in their struggle to survive against many odds.  Billy (Christina Hendricks) has two sons, a four year-old, and teenaged Bones (Iain De Caestecker), who works long hours gathering scrap metal and whatever else he can sell from empty buildings in town to help them survive.  Much of the town was abandoned following a major flood (which has a story behind it), but a few people stubbornly hold onto their homes.  Billy is one of these, but she is behind on her payments, and the bank manager, Dave (Ben Mendelsohn) who owns a bordello, wants her to start working there.  Her older son is clearly against this, and is trying to make enough money selling scraps to support the family, but standing in his way is the town Bully (Matt Smith), who claims he owns the town and doesn’t want anyone “stealing” from him.  He has no qualms about killing and maiming those who defy his orders, so now, Bones’ life is in danger.
            After the flood, residents believe their town was cursed, and one named Belladonna (Barbara Steele) became mute.  Her granddaughter, called Rat (Saoirse Ronan), takes care of her, and is Bones’ best friend.  She shares a historical video with Bones that reveals significant parts of the town’s history, and he goes looking for a city buried beneath the river.  There, he finds something that will be of critical value later.  Simultaneously, there are intrigues taking place at the Bordello, where the Cat (Eva Mendes) and Billy entertain club patrons with weird, titillating acts featuring sadistic pleasures (lots of “blood”) and Dave sexually harasses Billy. 
            As the flaming houses, decaying buildings, and tangled forests float by on the screen, with the melodic but haunting score of Johnny Jewel, the viewer is struck by the visual beauty amidst human poverty and suffering, and the cruelty of some.  Cinematographer Benoit Debie’s work enhances all these effects. 
            Gosling’s underlying points seem to relate to current events such as the growing importance of family in a self-serving world and the increasing disparity between a few mega-wealthy people and everyone else.  But families through the centuries have survived almost impossible odds; maybe that’s where humanity’s hope lies.

Grade:  B                       

Conversation Hour at SXSW Film Festival, 2015

           Del Toro (always an entertainment) praised Gosling’s new film and directorial debut, Lost River, as “weird, a fairy tale, and magical—one in which anything is possible.”  Briefly, it is meant as a fairy tale in which a single parent has to fight for survival after their town is abandoned following a catastrophe.  One day, the teenage son in the family finds a mysterious city hidden under the water of the river.  This leads them on a surprising journey that will test the limits of their love for one another.
           The history of Lost River is that it was three years in the making.  Gosling first approached del Toro with his ideas, often expressed simply in pictures, which he had taken after Detroit was abandoned following the crash of the U.S automobile industry.  del Toro emphasized that the finished product differed little from how it was mapped out in the beginning, and told Gosling, “I’ll direct it if you don.” 
           Gosling was intent on tapping into the feeling of Detroit in a fairy tale format.  Gosling, as a child in Canada, used to look at Detroit as the American Dream, and now it had come to this.  Paired with those images, the film is partially based on Gosling’s personal life, growing up in a single-parent family; his mother was beautiful, but bothered by the catcalls she got simply walking down the street, so saw men primarily as predators.  
             Lost River was difficult to shoot because of the need to enhance the fairy-tale effect, so Gosling engaged the talented Benoit Debie, who only shoots on film (not digital), and the two of them kept the lighting low, using only hints of color.  The intent was always to make it as mysterious and magical, without going over the edge.  The music by Johnny Jewel added to the magical tone using romantic melodies with dark, threatening undertones
           In casting, Gosling talked lovingly about the actors, having recruited the main characters from his friendships.  His style is to write the characters and then allow the actors to fill them in.  He spoke of Barbara Steele (Belladonna) as representing the mystery of the story, lending a powerful presence.  He required people auditioning for the role of Dave, the bordello owner, to do an audition online on an open site by having them read a Robert Frost poem and perform a dance as if they were dancing with someone else.  Ben Mendelsohn nailed the part, making a big production of the dance, and increasing its dramatic effect by periodically dancing off-screen.  There are fairy-tale like names for characters, such as Dr. Fucking Who, who longs to be the king of a place where there are no subjects and Rat, a hoarder who lives like a rat and has a rat for a friend.  Then there is the talented four year-old whom Gosling sees as a future “Marlon Brando.”   Because Franky actually didn’t like cameras, the crew had to film him out of his sight by, for instance, hiding themselves and their cameras behind bushes.
           The current residents of Detroit coincidentally got into the picture because Gosling had the choice of keeping them off the set—which seemed impossible—or using them in the scenes.  He decided they added an authenticity to the production by integrating reality into the fantasy. 
           Lost River is meant to be viewed as magical realism, as when a work of art has magical, unrealistic elements in an otherwise realistic world, such as a fairy tale, for example.  Gosling intentionally inserted those elements into his film to capture better what he had observed as changes Detroit went through after it was almost abandoned by the auto industry.  The story, color, and tone of the work is in the tradition of Terrence Malick (Tree of Life and To the Wonder) and Nicolas Winding Rifn (Only God Forgives).

By Donna R. Copeland